| ??? 09/25/06 14:47 Modified: 09/25/06 14:56 Read: times |
#125008 - against NASA rules, sorry Andy posted before Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I always keep a debug version of the compiled source where all the optimizations have been turned off
In that scenario, you can not "fly what you test" [edit] Sorry Andy, I posted before I came to your post. the argument FOR optimizing and, still, following the NASA rule is valid if you have a "testing department" with a huge budget. However, I (with the testing budget available) do quite a bit of testing by poking values in the ICE. So, my "tested" code (no code is EVER fully tested) is the non-optimized. Erik succesful testing does not show the abscence of bugs, it only show the abscence of KNOWN bugs |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| debuging C code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Management solution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I kind of hope | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| False assumption | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| to HLL or not to HLL | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Things for which an HLL cannot be trusted... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sometimes there's no other way | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that was not me, but Andy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Timing - end of wrong stick | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thats not the point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| better, don't use C at all.. :-) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| experience and knowledge | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the key word is "manifest" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| NASA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| against NASA rules, sorry Andy posted before | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Testing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Pointers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| In the real world | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| worse than that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
customers complaining or not ... | 01/01/70 00:00 |