Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
04/20/06 15:40
Read: times


 		 #114609 - resolution/max error using ralph
Responding to: ???'s previous message
the resolution/max error using the "read timer to ralph" approach will be the duration of of the IST that writes the timer to "ralph". Such an ISR should, even with a "steam driven processor" be less than, say 25us. I doubt such a max error would affect what Suresh is doing.

Erik

List of 52 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Measuring Bounce of a Reed Switch            01/01/70 00:00      
   Current progress.            01/01/70 00:00      
      reply            01/01/70 00:00      
         DSO            01/01/70 00:00      
            Of course its a good idea ;-)            01/01/70 00:00      
               also..            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Rather redrawing, i prefer ...            01/01/70 00:00      
   Schematic is incomplete            01/01/70 00:00      
      Simple way            01/01/70 00:00      
   I would do it like that            01/01/70 00:00      
      detecting end of bounce?            01/01/70 00:00      
         Much simpler            01/01/70 00:00      
            this is all getting complicated            01/01/70 00:00      
               there may be definition problem here            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Thanks Richard            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Question and answer            01/01/70 00:00      
                     You're right, of course            01/01/70 00:00      
                        They tell it here            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Yes, it's pretty complete.            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Form A            01/01/70 00:00      
                     More sophisticated? Maybe not.            01/01/70 00:00      
                        OK brass tacks            01/01/70 00:00      
                           that's the basic idea            01/01/70 00:00      
                              60386 processor            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 that wasn't the point, Suresh            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    resolution/max error using ralph            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       not so fast ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    reply            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       Really?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          I doubted when i typed            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             and the manual is right! sorry.            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                Really?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   correction            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                      There could be. But I made the mistake            01/01/70 00:00      
            Quantum flux compensator?            01/01/70 00:00      
               is it still April 1            01/01/70 00:00      
                  You are right but,            01/01/70 00:00      
               he means a flux capacitor ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  And I thought...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Compensator            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Translation            01/01/70 00:00      
            quantum flux capacitor?            01/01/70 00:00      
               language, culture            01/01/70 00:00      
                  reply : april 1!            01/01/70 00:00      
                     no, it was a natural response            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Ok Erik.            01/01/70 00:00      
                           The "Flux Capacitor" is from a movie            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Yes. to some extent!            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Never wanted to fool you!            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Obviously            01/01/70 00:00      
                           A joke and fooling someone is NOT the sa            01/01/70 00:00      
                              This made me think like that            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List