| ??? 02/08/06 23:10 Read: times |
#109562 - Because Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I would need to learn it up front. I may not have the time to learn the chip and tools for a short project. Plus, finding the warts is a pain. I did a PSOC project once. What a nightmare. On the surface the chip is great. The limitations helped kill the project. So, I can never use it again, here anyway. Can't get burned twice. But I have heard good stuff about the AVR. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| What is like a PIC16F877 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Link. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| stupid magazine .. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| be realistic, guys | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Really advantageous? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| an answer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| multi-chip option | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that would require | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I had a look into PIC16F87x datasheet | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sounds a lot like a LPC93x | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| match | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That is one of the toughest changeover | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes It does | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What I use... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Because | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Internal ADC uses | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| DSPIC | 01/01/70 00:00 |