| ??? 02/08/06 15:32 Read: times |
#109518 - that would require Responding to: ???'s previous message |
OK, Kai, so what would be your recommended (multi-chip) option for PIC16F876 / PIC16F877-alike (10 bit A/D, Strong Port Drive, Flash, 5 volts)?
That would require Kai to read PIC datasheets, just to answer a question, is that not a bit too much? If you want to push the issue, do not state "Strong Port Drive" but "20mA sink ports" not "10 bit A/D" but "single ended 10 bit A/D" The above examples are examples, I did NOT read the PIC datasheet and have no idea what the port sink capacity is. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| What is like a PIC16F877 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Link. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| stupid magazine .. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| be realistic, guys | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Really advantageous? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| an answer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| multi-chip option | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that would require | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I had a look into PIC16F87x datasheet | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sounds a lot like a LPC93x | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| match | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That is one of the toughest changeover | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes It does | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What I use... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Because | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Internal ADC uses | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| DSPIC | 01/01/70 00:00 |