| ??? 08/17/05 14:34 Read: times |
#99561 - AT89C51RC2 with 128 bytes per page Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I had found a few calls to these ?C?xxx routines in my FlashRoutine. These routines are inside the ?C?LIB_CODE, which is at the location 0x349.
By the way, I am using the byte write command (R1 = 0x09) in my FlashRoutine. I am going to try the new code without the ?C?xxx routines. Maybe this time I can do 0x0000 -> 0x1000. Will post result later. Thanks. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Strange problem IAP for whole chip | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Questions please | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nobody knows? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| For IAP? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Which is exactly what FlashMagic is inte | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| and now we know why | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Get a PC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Enclose PCB in a box | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I understand | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Process make sense | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thank god for the response | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maybe the libraries in causing it ??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the problem with absolutes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| AT89C51RC2 with 128 bytes per page | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| there is no such thing as a byte write, | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| byte write | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No byte write | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what was the problem? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Problem was ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OK, now face problems in Variables | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| variables used in my remote update | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ok, Solved | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Try this | 01/01/70 00:00 |