| ??? 08/12/05 13:08 Read: times |
#99265 - Could you poll instead? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
With those frequency and instruction clock parameters, using interrupts to capture an 8us signal seems like it would border on infeasible (I haven't done the calculations). If you can't achieve it using interrupts, would your design allow for polling to eliminate the overhead of interrupts? If you can't, you'd better start considering a high-frequency/reduced-clock MCU variant.
We've contrasted interrupts and polling methods before. An example: http://www.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=73532 |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Interrupt Latency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Clock speed ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| many factors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Just curious... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not that I know of, my recollection evid | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Interrupt Latency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| calculate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Could you poll instead? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| He's got one, but is running it in 12 cl | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Another way maybe | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Depends upon the ISR & crystal | 01/01/70 00:00 |