| ??? 07/25/05 17:08 Read: times |
#98067 - I second that! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Thanks - it was my fault for not reading this thread in detail first.
Just saw the first question and thought it was Atmel specific. I apologize for that! |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| CAN nodes ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| CAN | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not atmel specifically... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Philips, SILabs, "Siemens" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ah well | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yep | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ah the most used | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not needed` | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| CAN | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I do not know, but please check | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| just ordered | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Automotive protocol | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ah dunno | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| CANopen | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| CanOpen | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| CAN | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Exactly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not sure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| non-crazy-a little more sure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Mattias' question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I second that! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| selecting processor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| who cares | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Atmel CAN | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| CAN and LIN | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| MCP2510 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Raj -yes! | 01/01/70 00:00 |