| ??? 07/25/05 16:38 Modified: 07/25/05 16:39 Read: times |
#98060 - non-crazy-a little more sure Responding to: ???'s previous message |
(sorry, first part of this thread was a response to eriks question, missed the placement)
It does state in the CIP-51 Micro section that it is fully compatible with MCS-51 instruction set. It also handles the standard peripherals the same. The CAN portion though is definitley not standard and SILABS follows BOSCH_CAN implimentation using 32 message objects in CAN memory. I haven't shopped around recectly for CAN equiped controllers, but I remember looking (beriefly) at a phillips one. They had a 1k (bit or byte, can't remember) buffer for holding messages, which sounds like a nice feature. I do find the 32 message objects on the SILABS enough for my needs. Andy |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| CAN nodes ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| CAN | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not atmel specifically... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Philips, SILabs, "Siemens" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ah well | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yep | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ah the most used | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not needed` | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| CAN | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I do not know, but please check | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| just ordered | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Automotive protocol | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ah dunno | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| CANopen | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| CanOpen | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| CAN | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Exactly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not sure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| non-crazy-a little more sure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Mattias' question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I second that! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| selecting processor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| who cares | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Atmel CAN | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| CAN and LIN | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| MCP2510 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Raj -yes! | 01/01/70 00:00 |