| ??? 06/20/05 08:50 Read: times |
#95325 - Compatibility Responding to: ???'s previous message |
"its to allow vendors the ability to add new features and at the same time maintain compatability with older products."
I don't see how that could be the reason in this case, if bit 1 is given a function in future then using the method of incrementing AUXR1 to switch between DPTR0 and DPTR1 would then have a side effect. I suppose you could have yet another bit to select 'legacy compatibility mode', or something, but then it's all getting a bit ridiculous. It seems a reasonable question to me, if somewhat pointless. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| AUXR1 Register in AT89C51RD2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Selecting more than two DPTRs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| all derivatives | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not all members | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Compatibility | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| or maybe | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Don't shoot! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| who cares ONE iota - and, if you want to | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thank you for your suggestion. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Because thay can! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not directed to | 01/01/70 00:00 |