| ??? 06/01/05 11:13 Read: times |
#94180 - Bang on target... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
There is no need for the frequency if i am sampling for a long enough time. The method that i followed is just as you wrote here. Actually, this problem(finding RMS of sinusoidal signal) was a part of a programming competition in my college and we were given the frequency and the type of signal(i.e. sinusoidal). Frequency doesn't matter actually. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| RMS Calculation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Going back to basics... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How Many Samples Per Second? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Square Root Algorithm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RMS for sinusoidal signals | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Clarification | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I beg a question... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Full o' holes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Bang on target... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| thats true... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RMS Value | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Please elaborate more... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Elaboration | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Correction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| DC+AC RMS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| DC contribution to total rms value | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanx Anywayz... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| square root by Newton's Rule | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Lookup table | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| better option...as of now | 01/01/70 00:00 |