| ??? 05/29/05 20:49 Read: times |
#94099 - Full o' holes Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Michael Karas said:
Shoot holes in the ideas if I'm wholly wrong!! OK, here goes... ;-) No, actually you're quite right. I did say, "you don't need to know the frequency precisely - you just need to know it close enough so that you can get a good enough estimate of the peaks." The issue is being able to detect the peak value - I think you probably have some good frequency-insensitive suggestions to achieve that goal. If the amplitude does not vary rapidly, I think the easiest way to get the peak value would simply be to use a rectifier & smoothing cap - the ADC then just measures the smoothed rectifier output... |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| RMS Calculation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Going back to basics... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How Many Samples Per Second? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Square Root Algorithm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RMS for sinusoidal signals | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Clarification | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I beg a question... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Full o' holes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Bang on target... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| thats true... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RMS Value | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Please elaborate more... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Elaboration | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Correction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| DC+AC RMS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| DC contribution to total rms value | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanx Anywayz... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| square root by Newton's Rule | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Lookup table | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| better option...as of now | 01/01/70 00:00 |



