| ??? 04/22/05 18:07 Read: times |
#92195 - who does so Responding to: ???'s previous message |
If it pops's into a '51 socket and executes '51 opcodes what would preclude its relevance to this forum.
Nothing, if that is what you do. But who on earth would use a 251 in '51 mode, no gain just pain. It is not my decision to exclude the "16 bit '512 derivatives (251, XA, 16x)" I have actually suggested including them at one time. My point is that if the 251 is to be included, so should the XA and the 16x. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Code banking (HUGE) 80251 + PSD834 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 251 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Daft idea? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Code banking (HUGE) 80251 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| does repeating make it on topic? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Still daft? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| '251 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| they sure are | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| They sure are "what"? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| who does so | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| '251 Native Addressing Capability | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Code banking (HUGE) xxx51+PSD834 | 01/01/70 00:00 |