| ??? 04/10/05 20:35 Modified: 04/10/05 20:36 Read: times |
#91345 - Atel v.s. Philips Responding to: ???'s previous message |
With regard to the ISP boot loader function the Atmel approach seems more "designed-in" doesn't it. The Philips approach seems to be more of a "bolt-on".
Michael Karas |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| P89C51RD2BN ISP stopped working | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I guess you lost the boot vector | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no more lost vectors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I think I know the reason | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Erase option.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I take this back | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not this one then ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| message received..... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Incomplete program download | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Again i lost one more P89C51RD2HBP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No such danger on the Atmels | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Atel v.s. Philips | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| lose none - EVER | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re | 01/01/70 00:00 |