| ??? 04/05/05 12:14 Read: times |
#91024 - oh silly mistake Responding to: ???'s previous message |
right erik why f020 why not f12x
you are right i should go for f12x neglecting cost factor which came to my mind before i think cost will not be an issu if i got required resolution. thanks for correcting me kuldeep |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| induction heating machine | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Discussed recently. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| all right | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What have you done so far. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Very High frequency resolution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| guess | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Very High frequency resolution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What methods have you considered? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Inclined to agree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re inclined to agree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| External sync. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Try evaluating this | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| echo | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 1 HZ resolution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Duh!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ok than | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why f020 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| oh silly mistake | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
cost factor | 01/01/70 00:00 |