| ??? 04/05/05 06:55 Read: times |
#91017 - Duh!! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I thought Steves question about hardware NCO implementation was a subtle hint about how you can generate the required solution,obviously we dont do subtle ;) The answer if you really want to generate high frequency resolution is to use an NCO with suitably large data words ,but to be honest I agree with eric I don't think that induction heating it a gentle art and its not going to be that sensitive. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| induction heating machine | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Discussed recently. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| all right | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What have you done so far. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Very High frequency resolution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| guess | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Very High frequency resolution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What methods have you considered? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Inclined to agree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re inclined to agree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| External sync. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Try evaluating this | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| echo | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 1 HZ resolution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Duh!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ok than | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why f020 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| oh silly mistake | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
cost factor | 01/01/70 00:00 |