| ??? 03/31/05 16:20 Read: times |
#90758 - You're telling me. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
"Donald,
He is using one of a group of nearly identical processors known as 89c51Rx2." No, he is not. "He states in the title that the specific processor is AT89C51RD2." Correct. "I said that what I remembered about some processors in this group might not apply to his specific processor." His processor is not one of a group called 89C51Rx2. It is an AT89C51RD2 which is one of a group of three near identical processors: AT89C51RD2 AT89C51ED2 AT89C51ID2 which, as you see, cannot be described as members of a group called 89C51Rx2, but could be described as members of a group of processors called AT89C51xD2. "I said that what I remembered about some processors in this group might not apply to his specific processor" You are dead right there. "So he IS using a 89c51Rx2, specifically the AT89C51RD2." Please, please stop repeating this. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| AT89C51RD2 problems | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Speeds?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Further Details of the RD2 Enviornment | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| maybe | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| relevant | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Irrelevant | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sure he is | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I beg to differ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Atmel product AT89C51RD2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| this is getting silly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You're telling me. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| one truth does not make another a lie | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ridiculous meter goes off-scale | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| cross posted | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not ridiculus, just different opinions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Lets try to discuss the problem | 01/01/70 00:00 |