| ??? 03/30/05 16:55 Modified: 03/30/05 17:01 Read: times |
#90703 - relevant Responding to: ???'s previous message |
That may be so, but it's hardly relevant to the AT89C51RD2, is it?
It is to the fact that which of the "traps" apply. As I said: "Many things, and I can not remember all the differences, are only in some of them thus "some of the Rx2s" below. You will need to check the datasheet." Thus I could not state with certainty that which of what I said applied to his particiular Rx2 Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| AT89C51RD2 problems | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Speeds?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Further Details of the RD2 Enviornment | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| maybe | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| relevant | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Irrelevant | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sure he is | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I beg to differ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Atmel product AT89C51RD2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| this is getting silly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You're telling me. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| one truth does not make another a lie | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ridiculous meter goes off-scale | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| cross posted | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not ridiculus, just different opinions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Lets try to discuss the problem | 01/01/70 00:00 |