| ??? 03/28/05 15:59 Read: times |
#90550 - Nothing wrong with DIL Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik Malund said:
that many derivatives are not avalilable.
There are .1" pinning PLCC44 sockets available and using one such would enhance the number of possible devices. I know of no derivative (except ancients) that is avaialable in DIL and not in PLCC. ... Erik Erik, Nothing's wrong with DIL, on the contrary, I would say. And yes, PLCC is a nice alternative, since you still have sockets for those kinds of packages and as such can place and replace a processor in an easy way, should it be necessary. Erik Malund said:
Someone mentioned adapter sockets, that would create total havoc if the frequency was anything significant. You're pointing at a statement I made some replies above. And you're right if indeed the frequency would be a problem. But do you think at speeds of --let's say-- 20MHz, using an adaptor would cause so much damage? We're not talking about the GHz, as they are being used for Intel processors. Best rgds, --Geert |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| dev. board | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| hhmmm well | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| cheap | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nice initiative | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SoftICE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You're correct, Jan | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| questions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| To DIL or not to DIL | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| emulator? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What's wrong with DIL? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nothing wrong with DIL | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Geert | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Development boards | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The idea was KISS and "GNU" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Something like this? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Softice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| testboard etc. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| testboard etc. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| DIN standard | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| DIN 41612 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| simmstick | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| simmstick? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Its a useful format | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| And mother or daughter? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| DT107 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| agreed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| to simm or not to simm | 01/01/70 00:00 |