| ??? 03/27/05 07:53 Read: times |
#90473 - assembly Responding to: ???'s previous message |
converting to assembly can postpone the day that you have to move up to a heavier, more expensive processor. you can squeeze more code and throughput in. and upgrading the processor is not always an option. it is not harder than C once you get going with it. if you are stringing together subroutines they could just as well be in assembly as in C. james |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 8051 in C or assembly? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Probably C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Always C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Mostly 'C' | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No magic wand | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Assembler when? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Shared data problem?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Shared Data Problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I see | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sared Data | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| addendum | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Shared Data | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Knowledge, not language. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Knowledge | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Knowledge | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Promotion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Promotion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Promotion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Traps for the unwary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Preaching | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ditto | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| red rag.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Bend over then... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| hauling assembler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Clarification | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Keil Allows this to be disabled | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Know your tools | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It means 8 bit may be 16 bits | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| More knowledge! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not really | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| So which... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Calculations in C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ibid | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not always.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Example | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Better?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| assembly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| YMMV | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| assembly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hitting the Wall | 01/01/70 00:00 |