Exactly my point. You brought up bandwidth as a problem. I responded by saing that bandwidth may not need to be an important factor, as indicated by the sentence I now underlined in the quote. And both Andy and I notes that the best choice will depend on the OP's application, in which case we can't simply say which solution is best.

Listing a large number of RF manufacturers isn't really helpful. Either post links to their sites and have the OP spend his time reading through all the information, or post information about your experiences with them. And you obviously can't ask me what fits the OP's bill. Remember that the value of a specific solution to the requester may be completely different from your take on the same solution.

In your previous thread you say:

" We do imformation solutions where the sign may receive the new data hours, days or possibly weeks before the intended switch. Transfer speeds may not be an important issue. A way more important issue may be the required transmission distances"

Doesnt this depends on application to application ? , as you dont know OPs application it cannot be commmented.

-Ap

Exactly my point. You brought up bandwidth as a problem. I responded by saying that bandwidth may not need to be an important factor, as indicated by the sentence I now underlined in the quote. And both Andy and I notes that the best choice will depend on the OP's application, in which case we can't simply say which solution is best.

Do read your comments again ! . And don’t imagine solutions for OP , let him stay within his limits .You were Nagging me when I try to say which among the two modules could be a better solution >>Between those two<< . Do take into account we cannot ask OP to use all what is their in our head but explain him which among the solution he is trying to use is a better one? . I have 100 examples to compare so many modules will this help OP in anyways what he is not even ready to buy a 50$ solution .