| ??? 09/11/08 20:40 Read: times |
#158206 - incorrect code in a different place? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I agree that this function (which as I understand it, did not have any using directive) has no bad code. The compiler assumed the function to use register bank 0 correctly (IMHO).
But shouldn't the compiler also generate code in the ISR (using bank 2) to change the register bank back to 0 before it calls this function? I think the only way the compiler should create a problem is if you put the function in a separate source from the ISR and give the function implementation a using directive but forget that in the prototype you give to the ISR. Now if both objects forwarded the used register bank to the linker, the linker could still issue a warning or error. Any feedback from Keil yet? Greets, Maarten |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Keil C51 Compiler Bug | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| version? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Version | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| This is what Keil does | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not if you follow thw rules | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| And also call from elsewhere? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Revision... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Using 2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| did you have using 2 in the function header ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Using 2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| correct cde ---- | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Using 2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| people like it working | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Eee PC? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| HiTech vs Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OCG C compiler for 8051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| incorrect code in a different place? | 01/01/70 00:00 |