??? 08/25/08 15:29 Read: times Msg Score: -1 -1 Answer is Wrong |
#157742 - Using 2 Responding to: ???'s previous message |
No I did not. But I had two writes to two different variables. The first generated an absolute address which was wrong:
mov @r0,rb0r5 (A605) for register R5 and the second generated the correct code: mov 21h,r5 (8D21) the correct code directly followed the bad code. Maybe if I put a using 2 in the function it would have worked. I did not try that. |
Topic | Author | Date |
Keil C51 Compiler Bug | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
version? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Version | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
This is what Keil does | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not if you follow thw rules | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
And also call from elsewhere? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Revision... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Using 2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
did you have using 2 in the function header ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Using 2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
correct cde ---- | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Using 2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
people like it working | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Eee PC? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
HiTech vs Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OCG C compiler for 8051![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
incorrect code in a different place? | 01/01/70 00:00 |