Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
06/12/08 12:06
Read: times


 
#155746 - I think the "which assembler" was directed to the
Responding to: ???'s previous message
I think the "which assembler" was directed to the OP.

anyhow, it's been a while since I last heard if the Intel assembler, but if it works (why wouldn't it) fine. Did the intel assembler ever make it to a windows version?

Erik

List of 16 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
PCON Register on AT89C52            01/01/70 00:00      
   try ORing the bit            01/01/70 00:00      
      ORL DOES mess with other bits, too...            01/01/70 00:00      
         The Intel assembler            01/01/70 00:00      
            OK, OK,            01/01/70 00:00      
            I think the "which assembler" was directed to the            01/01/70 00:00      
   Complete initiation            01/01/70 00:00      
      Initiation code and lst info            01/01/70 00:00      
         this looks good...            01/01/70 00:00      
            I was just stepping through            01/01/70 00:00      
               Stepping through?            01/01/70 00:00      
               what happens if ...            01/01/70 00:00      
               I can set certain bits in the PCON reg            01/01/70 00:00      
                  that may be the problem            01/01/70 00:00      
                  this is a bug in the monitor            01/01/70 00:00      
                  I was beginning to think the same            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List