??? 06/12/08 12:06 Read: times |
#155746 - I think the "which assembler" was directed to the Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I think the "which assembler" was directed to the OP.
anyhow, it's been a while since I last heard if the Intel assembler, but if it works (why wouldn't it) fine. Did the intel assembler ever make it to a windows version? Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
PCON Register on AT89C52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
try ORing the bit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ORL DOES mess with other bits, too... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The Intel assembler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OK, OK, | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I think the "which assembler" was directed to the | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Complete initiation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Initiation code and lst info | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
this looks good... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I was just stepping through | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Stepping through? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what happens if ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I can set certain bits in the PCON reg | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
that may be the problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
this is a bug in the monitor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I was beginning to think the same![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |