| ??? 06/02/08 14:56 Read: times |
#155407 - BAD documentation! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Which documentation? BAD documentation!
I'm terribly sorry to have bothered you with what seemed to have been confusing questions. I was looking at the December 2003 version of that document. Why of course, the newer version is much less confusing! |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Now I can't get "Erase Block" to work, 89C51RC2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| PLEASE, pretty please | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Atmel 89C51RC2-UM Erase Block | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| if there is no prefix on the chip... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| FLIP says it is an AT89C51RC2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oh, everybody remembers all previous posts, | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Well I remember all of yours! :) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why wouldn't be that? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Have I misinterpreted the documentation? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| WHICH documentation? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| BAD documentation! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| oh, THAT one IS bad indeed! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'd say this the reason why erase does not work... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No erase is needed, why did I think it was? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| but, Gary, we HAVE been talking about it... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I know, I have been missing that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| when I came accross IAP for the first time... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not How - but the Before/After | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Run In Simulation | 01/01/70 00:00 |