| ??? 06/02/08 11:47 Read: times |
#155386 - if there is no prefix on the chip... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
... then it is T89xxx NOT AT89xxx - it's a chip from the transient era, after Atmel acquired Temic, they produced the Temic chips under Atmel logo.
You need to have a look at the Temic datasheet, there are some minor differences between the two. JW PS. What is the signature of the chip? Do you use FLIP or a parallel programmer? |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Now I can't get "Erase Block" to work, 89C51RC2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| PLEASE, pretty please | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Atmel 89C51RC2-UM Erase Block | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| if there is no prefix on the chip... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| FLIP says it is an AT89C51RC2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oh, everybody remembers all previous posts, | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Well I remember all of yours! :) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why wouldn't be that? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Have I misinterpreted the documentation? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| WHICH documentation? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| BAD documentation! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| oh, THAT one IS bad indeed! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'd say this the reason why erase does not work... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No erase is needed, why did I think it was? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| but, Gary, we HAVE been talking about it... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I know, I have been missing that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| when I came accross IAP for the first time... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not How - but the Before/After | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Run In Simulation | 01/01/70 00:00 |