| ??? 07/26/07 19:05 Read: times |
#142377 - It was the boot loader bit Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Thanks much for the advice. We use a parallel programmer to burn the firmware on the chips.
We didn't realize the AT89C51RC2 requires a second step in the programming process, that is, to separately program the boot loader bit in the boot sector. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Trouble migrating AT89C55WD to AT89C51RC2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 89C51 or 89V51? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| P89V51RC2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| bootvector/status byte | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| my question too | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It was the boot loader bit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
second step? | 01/01/70 00:00 |