| ??? 04/21/06 22:27 Read: times |
#114722 - If you don't have a better approach Responding to: ???'s previous message |
You might want to look up the AMD AM9511, which is a floating point coprocessor/calculator, or the AM9512, which is a simpler but higher-precision version of the "4-banger" (+ , - , * , / ). Both are very efficient in resource usage. The documents are very detailed.
RE |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| help to build calculator on a chip(c,c++ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it is term paper time | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| reply | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| thought so | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| work on c,c++(erik ) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| maybe I was not clear | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| for (erik) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| when asking micro, e-mail him | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 01/01/70 00:00 | ||
| not your e-mail | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ok | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| tools | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Idea | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| can u tell it for microchip(jon led.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Almost totally different | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ok | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| do not forget | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I agree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The Development Process | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 8051 compared w/ gen calc | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
hi | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If you don't have a better approach | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| DIY Calculator | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 8955wd watchdog C code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Off-topic | 01/01/70 00:00 |