It seems that a lot of people are tryning to create a true random number without any random input. Well, there are those that try to make a perpetuum mobile as well,

E.g. the Keil implementation is good enough if you can live with pseudo random, a "less pseudo" will still be pseudo.

It seems that some believe that apps that need true random somehow can be serviced by a better pseudorandom. Look at my Keil/J1708 example http://www.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=111937.
If you can tell me a means of making a "better" pseudorandom work any better for this than using the Keil routine, I will retract this statement.

Erik