| ??? 02/09/06 20:04 Read: times |
#109644 - Neat Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Andy Neil said:
Grant Beattie said:
My old DOS test box running PCPLUS honors XOFF *immediately*. Don't know what the UART is in it though Some UARTs can (could?) actually do XON/XOFF in hardware - maybe it had one of them? But is it really software flow control then? :) In all seriousness though, that is a very useful feature that would offset the disadvantage of using a traditional hardware FIFO in a system that leverages software flow control. --Sasha Jevtic |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| XON/XOFF control | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what do you need to know? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| XON/XOFF control | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What's the problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Buffer overflow | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Standard Keil implementation! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Software flow control in depth | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| nice! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Bad 16550s | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: Bad 16550s | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| XOFF Clarification | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Software flow control in hardware | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Neat | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Opposite of SMS? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Pesky hardware FIFOs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Bad 16550's and Control | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| then join me and score it | 01/01/70 00:00 |