| ??? 02/08/06 17:56 Read: times |
#109540 - Bad 16550s Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Jan Waclawek said:
Sasha: this was very nice, could be made a FAQ. Thank you. Sasha Jevtic said:
think: 16550 and friends, although not the ones with the broken FIFO Can you be more specific, please? Jan Waclawek Unfortunately (or perhaps fortunately), I haven't had any experience with this issue myself. I remember quite a bit of commotion some years ago when early versions 16550 UARTs had serious FIFO errata. A quick search didn't turn up any old errata sheets, but I did see a few references to the problem, including one from Microsoft claiming difficulties with the 16550AF: http://www.beyondlogic.org/serial/serial.htm#9 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/q103108/ Perhaps some of the more senior members of the forum have had experiences with this and/or have some errata sheets squirreled away that they could share. --Sasha Jevtic |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| XON/XOFF control | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what do you need to know? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| XON/XOFF control | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What's the problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Buffer overflow | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Standard Keil implementation! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Software flow control in depth | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| nice! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Bad 16550s | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: Bad 16550s | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| XOFF Clarification | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Software flow control in hardware | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Neat | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Opposite of SMS? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Pesky hardware FIFOs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Bad 16550's and Control | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| then join me and score it | 01/01/70 00:00 |