??? 01/20/06 15:34 Modified: 01/20/06 15:35 Read: times |
#107890 - it was not Responding to: ???'s previous message |
RxD, TxD - that was an initial requirement
it was not, you never responded to respond on UART Rx ??? (my first post in this thread). No clarification from the OP (in this case Jan), once more, generated a lot of answers based on assumptions.. Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
Quiz of the week | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Eh ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
how do you propose to do this,Mode0? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
corrected | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
32 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
this answer could be true, Jan, you shou | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
34 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
tear off | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
if mask program | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Bah | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
but you are meaner to the little bug | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Oops | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
33 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
33 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
32 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
37 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I'm dying | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
you'll need to wait until tomorrow... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
and that's why I'm not postulating | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Power over UART ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
don't guess | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why not | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
33 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
32 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Jan. 20, 12:47:40 UTC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Solution(?) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Bible study | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
EA must be connected ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
up in the air | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Come off it, | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
more than you believe | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I rest my case | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
well, the spec for the '32 stated it had![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
it was not | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
nope | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
nope, he posted "Sorry, slipped in. Corr | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Corrected | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
that is just absolutotally confoosing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Just out of curiosity | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
If I catch myself and it is e.g. an ambi | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ok so let's put it this way: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
sorry | 01/01/70 00:00 |