??? 01/11/06 02:26 Read: times |
#107015 - thanks Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Russell, thanks for that. I did get how the SCLK was being used, what I posted was just a segment of what I wanted to do.
IIRC, the SCLK is (essentially) pulsed on and off to get each bit, correct? |
Topic | Author | Date |
max186 clarification | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Clock | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
meaning | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
no almost there | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I'm using | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
and the reason you asked is? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
two reasons | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
aha | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
possibly. can you handle the overhead o | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
bb SPI | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what is "BB SPI" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
(B)it (B)anged SPI | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
MAX186 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Something to check![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
setb clrb | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
muchos gracias (much thanks) | 01/01/70 00:00 |