Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
12/06/05 07:21
Read: times


 
#104746 - Exactly !
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Sarang Patki said:
Well not necessary always (not atleast in this case, as it is reverse engineering. And the one who is doing it does not know what the whole code is doing and thats why reverse engineering!)

That's exactly how it was going on ! I started with copying of the whole text to editor and adding comments to the parts that I understood. First into the little subroutine - which then got the apropriate label name. And then I copied "Mply by 100" to all the places. I can easily accept that once or twice was enough ! And then, by adding more and more comments, I came to the principle and function of the whole routine, and as the last, I wrote the first 2 lines, to describe the function of the program.


Regards, Slobodan




List of 30 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
week puzzle V            01/01/70 00:00      
   that would be intersating only to codebr            01/01/70 00:00      
      codebreakers            01/01/70 00:00      
         busted            01/01/70 00:00      
   having a guess            01/01/70 00:00      
   Hmm,isn't it demotivating to reengineer?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Cool algorithm            01/01/70 00:00      
      maybe            01/01/70 00:00      
   Looks like BCD to binary routine            01/01/70 00:00      
   My assumption            01/01/70 00:00      
   The source with comments !            01/01/70 00:00      
      thanks            01/01/70 00:00      
         Seems more elegant ...            01/01/70 00:00      
            optimized=ugly            01/01/70 00:00      
         why "xrl a,#0F0h" ?            01/01/70 00:00      
            Wow!            01/01/70 00:00      
         A bit shorter ...            01/01/70 00:00      
            za Slobodana Mandarica            01/01/70 00:00      
      another approach            01/01/70 00:00      
         optimizing further            01/01/70 00:00      
            packed bcd            01/01/70 00:00      
               packed bcd... by specification :-)            01/01/70 00:00      
      that is not comments, that is "explanati            01/01/70 00:00      
         true if            01/01/70 00:00      
         Yes they are Comments            01/01/70 00:00      
            Exactly !            01/01/70 00:00      
            I have seen such called "comments" way t            01/01/70 00:00      
               more on comments            01/01/70 00:00      
                  the point            01/01/70 00:00      
                     "anyone" and the point            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List