| ??? 09/02/05 14:09 Modified: 09/02/05 14:13 Read: times |
#100464 - then should they do that too for those t Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Maybe they should have given it a part number that doesn't look so much like their other 51 family chips.
then should they do that too for those that have a PCA, those that have A/D ..... The '51 indicate the processor not the peripherals. SILabs have '51 derivatives (in the f12x series) with a MAC, what about those? Erik Anyhow maybe it would be an idea for Keil to add a selection "dot" to the table "if you are looking for something special for which we do not have a selection, these are the chips that may have it". If such a selection were available I, for one, would check it now and then. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| AT89C51SND1 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 8051 underpowered | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not the AT89C51SND1!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Cool chip | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| then should they do that too for those t | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Special Dot | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "Not Useful" rather than "Wrong" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Start Here | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Still confused.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Just starting... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| lend | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanx | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What about the AT89C51SND2C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Looking a gift horse in the mouth...? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
AT89C51SND2C includes the AT73C213 | 01/01/70 00:00 |