| ??? 08/30/05 15:51 Read: times |
#100300 - HUH? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Maybe this works in your application, but can result in unpredictable performance when changing cable length, cable type,
I have cables from 3" TO 6' and am running pulses at 2MHz. The beauty of using ferrites is that they "round" the pulses a bit and dramatically cut down on EMI and reflections. Of course, if you do not use a schmitt in the receiveing end all bets are off. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| driving ribboncabel - ESD precautions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| on interconnect | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Alternative | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| comments. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Recommended scheme | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 74H? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| nope | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Don't forget series termination | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| series termination | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: series termination | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| an, in my opinion, much better way is to | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Series termination is the correct method | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| both? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Series termination prevents overshot | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| HUH? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Huh Huh? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| read the original post | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Think about the newbies | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That is exacltly why I always push the u | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RS485 is a good alternative, indeed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Use a relay driver and sleep well ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ferite bead, series termination, or | 01/01/70 00:00 |