| ??? 08/25/05 06:22 Read: times |
#100045 - That old chestnut! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Ghulam Mustafa said:
He told me that the hex file that is generated using C is quite larger than that of assembly programing. Yes, it is true that a skilled and experienced assembler programmer may be able to write more compact code than a 'C' compiler - but merely using assembler in itself will not magically make your code shrink! http://www.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=84079 http://www.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=90417 http://www.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=84078 Are you a skilled and experienced assembler programmer? do u have any idea about it especially if we are working on floating point and using kiel. If you're so worried about code size, do not use floating point - not in 'C'; not in assembler! |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Mathematics of Fractional # in Intel ass | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Search | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Actual task | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Lookup table? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Scale it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| echo........... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sounds like fun, but it will take you ma | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Using C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Space occupied | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That old chestnut! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Example | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Does it really matter, anyhow? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
why assembler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If actual fraction numbers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| And decimal number, | 01/01/70 00:00 |



