| ??? 06/18/12 14:08 Read: times |
#187770 - So? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Nothing wrong with C++ in embedded systems - as long as your embedded processor supports a "this" pointer without dying.
C++ is not equivalent with billions of new/delete in the code or a forced use of huge stream or STL libraries. So you can have identical efficiency compared to C. Just with extended rules for type checking, name spaces, data encapsulation etc. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Who the hell uses C++ in embedded systems... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| So? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| beware of (verbal) inflation. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not as many as some would think. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 2% don't know | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Same same | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Surveys | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Me! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Using tools that only supports C? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Tools and MISRA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C++ "better than C" for embedded systems | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| as far as the '51 goes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| As far as '51 goes - C++ is still viable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| class vs source | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I did say "smallish" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Overkill? | 01/01/70 00:00 |