| ??? 01/20/12 10:06 Read: times |
#185583 - Don't need kW to jam civilan "toy" equipment Responding to: ???'s previous message |
You don't need to look at huge transmitters. I gave them as an example where a very strong jumping transmitter requires a jamming transmitter with huge power output.
But our commercial transmitters have miniscule power output so you do not need a private nuclear reactor just to power the jamming transmitters. It's enough to look at the behaviour of WLAN, Bluetooth etc - the bandwidth are very much affected by the number of other weak transmitters operating in the same frequency bands. And a person who explicitly wants to jam a transmitter is hardly likely to look at the regulations. If a legal transmitter has 10 mW, then 500 mW will represent a quite strong jamming signal. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| RF amplifier for 4XX Mhz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Probably illegal? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| maybe... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Look for a legal solution! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's immune with Jam | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Immune? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| very high | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Don't need kW to jam civilan "toy" equipment | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You don't need to look at huge transmitters.? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Are there stores of info how's to implemented that? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Instruments | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that's why.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No - side band disturbances will still be uV and illegal | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| missing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| true | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No! No!! No!!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Teh limit is.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 500mW ... | 01/01/70 00:00 |