| ??? 10/22/11 13:56 Read: times |
#184316 - "Support" Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik Malund said:
c) "talking IAR" to ST FAEs seems to go a bit smoother than "talking Keil" I think it's unreasonable to expect ST FAEs to be experts in all toolchains - so this is probably down to the specific preference/experience of the particular people that you happen to have spoken to? Erik Malund said:
Keil does not support the ST checksumming You mean, Keil does not have a built-in STM32 Checksum generator? Keil has facilities for you to provide your own "utilities" like this - so you aren't tied to the way they choose to do it. the place I am curently working, for all practical purpuses, do not allow downloads of programs. Anyone who makes a rule like that with no procedure for considering exceptions is stupid. So you give them the three choices: 1. Use IAR (assuming that their checksum generator does what you need); 2. Use Keil, and write your own utility; 3. Use Keil, and make an exception for downloading this particular utility. Is there some issue about using IAR rather than Keil? |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| an impression | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Does that mean... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Don't they know about family planning? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Who's in whose bed? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| My impression | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| My impression is: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Far too serious man! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You're probably right, ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Can I draw a conclusion? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I would not draw that conclusion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what triggered my impression | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "Support" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
usually what tools you have ... | 01/01/70 00:00 |