| ??? 09/27/11 10:14 Read: times |
#183887 - Tuppence worth Responding to: ???'s previous message |
In my (limited) experience of ARM chips, the most troublesome aspect for the developer is the debug port. I found the JLINK debugger on the Analog Devices ADuC part was very troublesome, whilst the uLink on the LPC2138 was more stable. There's a lot of vendor discretion on the parts, so I would look at the Cortex parts as they appear to be more standardised. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| ARM Again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Long life | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Really? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's always moving! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Compiler long life is not import | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Tuppence worth | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I have worked with, and liked, | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| s/IAR/ARM/ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| NXP generally have very nice chips+manuals | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| thanx | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| J-Link | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| JTAG is just electrical if. Magic is in the debug cells | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "Debug Probe" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| On-board debug probes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That is what the ST Rep said | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 300 USD Keil JTAG was better than the 25USD ST one | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Same with most Keil ULINK versions. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
woukln't kniow - but | 01/01/70 00:00 |