| ??? 01/28/11 15:12 Read: times |
#180881 - Works both ways Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Per Westermark said:
I kind of suspect that the 9-bit mode may have started as manual use/abuse of partity. If that is the case it is ironical because I wrote a design idea published in EDN in 1998 that implemented the 9th bit on a PC by manipulating/abusing the parity bit. (Also an application note for Cypress). |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Origins of 9-bit, "Multiprocessor" UART mode? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| do not know, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| begged question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Pre-'51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I do not remember... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not remembering == Don't recall reading | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Have you forgotten 68xx? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No list of model numbers, so nothing to have forgotten | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How I spent my time | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Motorola not forgotten | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Have you forgotten your rule... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sub-question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Parity | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Works both ways | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| LOL | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I don't think so | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Exactly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Still don't think so | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
oscillation in system | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Cross-Post | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hee Hee... | 01/01/70 00:00 |