| ??? 08/01/10 21:10 Read: times |
#177562 - You're being too practical Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Comparing a 3GHz processor against a 100MHz controller is not being fair and is similar to comparing apples and oranges. At that point you're seeing straight performance and nothing else for efficiency. The price for such a processor is out the question, not to mention all of the hardware that must be purchased to support such a processor. In that regard, your argument holds no stance just because controllers do not yet have the speed of a processor. Even with your argument, you have proved how well a 100MHz controller can come close with a modern 3GHz processor and that a controller is still well suited for real-time for the same or better quality and more inexpensive equipment.
On another note, there are nice ideas that I have seen, such as, internal clocks. I wish that I could purchase more controllers with internal clocks. I have heard that PICs do contain internal silicon clocks. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| µ-controllers, µ-processors and DSPs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No-on last question. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| early DSP's had no converters | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Signal Processing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Digitial signal processing is mainly math. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it's all marketing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| There really isn't a true distinction anymore. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 8051 + MAC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I know. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| There is some confusion.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| DSP designed for concurrency of simple operations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Still some confusion... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| processor/processing, and absolute time contra clock cycles | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You're being too practical | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No magic ISR advantage for uC in relation to uP | 01/01/70 00:00 |



