| ??? 03/05/10 20:53 Read: times |
#173889 - Maybe I don't need Wiegand 26 Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Hi Andy:
I reread the link. Maybe don't need wiegand 26 because I do not have a long cable run. I don't have cable run just reader to read tag within two inches as a test. Using large coil reader and small tag. I just wanted to see how it worked and read it on the pc. Nothing more. So do you agree I don't need wiegand 26 in this case. Best regards, Ralph Sac |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| RFID Project | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You need to be specific! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| anti-collision | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| good to know | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I might have oversimplyfied the thing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You have | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Range | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| temperature | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 500mm Read Range | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ready made solution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Wiegand 26 can't find enough | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not yet | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I was hoping you | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How much research did you actually do? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Andy looked at that link | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What do you mean by "White Paper" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Your right that's not a white paper | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maybe I don't need Wiegand 26 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Tag Talking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Anticollision | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not an answer, but | 01/01/70 00:00 |



