| ??? 11/20/07 13:40 Read: times |
#147248 - learning C Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Which is a better sequence to learn 8051. .... Embedded C
I would strongly recommend that you learn C before you consider 'embedded' i.e. '51 C. It is so easy to go through e.g. Kochan: "programming in ANSI C" on the PC, there is no 'burn' the program into the uC, finding a way to display the results (UART - 232 - PC - hyperterminal) etc. You just code the things, compile them and voila! it on the PC screen. Trying to learn C as '51 C has so many disatracting fractors and all documentation onb '51 C requires that you know C. so, learn PC C, THEN go for 'embedded c" Erik PS I believe to have read that Borland let you have some old fully functional version of their compiler for free. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Sequence of learning 8051, asm and C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 2 Issues | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| my wrong path | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OT, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OT - error message | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Use the tags | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| single-character const | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| QED? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| As Erik suggests | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Just learning - too luxury. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| how can that be "too luxorious" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Foolish builder? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| pointer to a const | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| True, but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Explaining | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| helpfull ,thanks, but.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Declaration | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Adjust declaration | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
thanks again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| const | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no wrong path | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| learning C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Freebies | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Erik is right | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not necessary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You\'re skipping the most important step ... | 01/01/70 00:00 |