| ??? 01/09/07 01:31 Modified: 01/09/07 01:33 Read: times |
#130465 - Yes, live with the part, maybe, the vendor, never! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
The only thing worse, is what Atmel routinely does, as it would appear, namely to publish a totally unverified specification as final, and then back away from it, leaving 15 of 16 noteworthy features unavailable.
RE |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| What is TBD | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| To Be Determined | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Or Decided, or Defined, or... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| offen I see the word | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The true meaning of TBD | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sticky situations... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, "clue", not "glue". Thanks! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Or... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I once asked | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| And you believe it to be true? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| TBD, in anything other than an objective spec. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 120% agree!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a rewrite | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, guilty! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| my guess again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The problem is "time-to-market" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that would be even worse | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, live with the part, maybe, the vendor, never! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
datasheet lifecycle | 01/01/70 00:00 |