| ??? 01/02/07 18:27 Read: times |
#130342 - Defrag time Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Richard Erlacher said:
If these CPU's were really capable of that 3.6 GHz, it probably wouldn't take Windows XP >90 seconds to open a file, which it often does. When did you last defrag ? Steve |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Clock Source Of Celeron uP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's internal | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| since the 386? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Earliest PLL multiplier | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's misleading ... and it's confusing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Bill Gates's constant | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Defrag time | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I run defrag once a day | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| defrag | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| defrag! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Old age? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You've got that wrong, Andy! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| age | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Speed limit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| if you are feeling brave.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| So, how fast a signal was that? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It was a 1Ghz celery it clocked to 1.8Ghz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 |