Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
12/13/06 15:59
Read: times


 		 #129419 - I'd split it in two (or 4)
Responding to: ???'s previous message
I'd split it in two (or 4) and use a lookup table

for split in two
result = lookup[high byte]
result += lookup[low byte]

Erik

List of 40 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Looking for an algorithm.            01/01/70 00:00      
   I'd split it in two (or 4)            01/01/70 00:00      
      I've shown, in increseing detail, how to do it            01/01/70 00:00      
   Sorted, or only counted?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Counting is enough            01/01/70 00:00      
         Not sorting or counting then??            01/01/70 00:00      
            My approach.            01/01/70 00:00      
               Erik's idea is fast and simple!            01/01/70 00:00      
   did you even consider what I posted            01/01/70 00:00      
      I considered lookup tables.            01/01/70 00:00      
         look at my code it is right there            01/01/70 00:00      
         Can you explain your table?            01/01/70 00:00      
            Interpret it in binary            01/01/70 00:00      
               Hhm...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Use of the table/algorithm            01/01/70 00:00      
                  misunderstanding            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Ah. I thought so.            01/01/70 00:00      
            explanation of table            01/01/70 00:00      
   table lookup            01/01/70 00:00      
   now, I'm confused            01/01/70 00:00      
      The keyword is "enumerate".            01/01/70 00:00      
         i give up since nobody can answer in english            01/01/70 00:00      
            Meaning #1            01/01/70 00:00      
               there must be some language problem here            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Basically, a)            01/01/70 00:00      
                     then this will work (and I believe the fastest)            01/01/70 00:00      
                        maybe yes            01/01/70 00:00      
                           maybe faster, but not6 what he ned            01/01/70 00:00      
                              it's sometimes not easy to describe what one needs            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Sorting or counting            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Bit shifting            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    I elaborated.            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       Christoph, have you tried...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          It looks interesting ..            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             well, you said that...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                here you are            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   Works.            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                      compiler            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                         Benchmark            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                            thanks!            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List