| ??? 09/13/06 22:39 Read: times  | 
#124258 - I don't think so!  How do you find it? Responding to: ???'s previous message  | 
You can find things in the subject, but, most of the hits, when I searched for SPI, didn't have any more than a simple reference to SPI in 'em.  A few had it in the subject, and no further mention.  A few had some oblique reference, but no relevant information.  How do you find the information?  If you find 1 useful post for every 100 hits, you're not going to spend much time searching.
 At the risk of increasing the burden on the moderators, I'm going to make a suggestion ... How about the moderator(s) imposing a "supertitle" to a thread when the O/P's title doesn't shed light on the subject? I'm not sure how this would be done, but ... It wouldn't be bad if the moderators snipped off irrelevant (off-topic) comments and, in the unlikely but occasional event that the thread takes a turn in an interesting direction, snips off the new-topic-oriented part and assigns a new supertitle? That way, the title will shed light on the context, which posters' titles often don't do (What's the subject of "Help me!"?) RE RE  | 
| Topic | Author | Date | 
| does SEARCH need work? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the zen of searching | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maybe a FAQ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, id does! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| does GOOGLE search syntax work on 8052.COM? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I don't think so | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| forum suppressed from google | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not intentional | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Whoops | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It was Jan | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Subject header should contain simple descriptions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| common stuff | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I don't think so! How do you find it? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| searching | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| maybe a menu? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Subject != Topic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| This all means that we should be more careful | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
            Nuggets of golD        | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maybe results should be ranked ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'd be careful here | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Part of the system is already there. | 01/01/70 00:00 | 



