| ??? 09/08/06 17:35 Read: times |
#123939 - I don't think so... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Kelvin Yan said:
Create this function:
at 0x0000h void Reset (void) { // function Reset at code 0x0000 } Call Reset() to reset the main() Surely, if you create an empty funcion like this, the compiler will implement it simply as a RET - and where will that get you...???!!! Or it might optimise it out altogether! |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Soft reset in C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you can't do it with a jump anyhow | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No dog | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Very soft | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That was for Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Explanation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I try to explain. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Incorrect comment | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Is it a call? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yuk | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the good thing about C is... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| LOL, made my day - thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| and that's how | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| _asm ljmp 0x0000 _endasm; | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| goto in C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| goto scope | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| slow??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: Slow? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The simple way to do reset in C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I don't think so... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that is NOT a \'reset\' | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C wizard: Dan Saks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that is not what's tricky | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Bad karma | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| nothing wrong with that after a hard reset | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Mix Asysmbly | 01/01/70 00:00 |