| ??? 08/16/06 16:51 Read: times |
#122350 - a proverbial answer Responding to: ???'s previous message |
i think this covers it "some like the mother, some like the daughter"
I freely admit that the very first time I had to scan a keypad my first 'sketch' was high level scan, thinking more about it brought me to low level scan. Had I not considered the issue further, I would have ended up with a (working) design using high level. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| High or Low in keypad scanner? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| PNP? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| maybe with TTL, but what about CMOS? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I would not, the user does | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that depends on how you scan the inputs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| physical/technological reasons | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What sorts of reasons? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| early MOS technology | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maybe they did it... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oxymoron! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you spoilt my joke now | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Jokes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| We are living in a TTL world... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I don't know why this interests me, but ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a proverbial answer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| So you figure it's just a matter of preference? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You really should get out more! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, it's a second childhood ... or maybe a third | 01/01/70 00:00 |



